Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Speaking about performance, did anyone do a comparison of > mod_proxy against mod_jk to see how good/bad it is ? This is > really important information IMO, and I don't see how a > decision can be made without it. > Results a quite impressive, good question Remy :) Tomcat 5.0.27 + Apache 2.0.50 All tests done on a clean startup with empty logs. ProxyPass /servlets-examples/ http://localhost:8080/servlets-examples/ ProxyPassReverse /servlets-examples/ http://localhost:8080/servlets-examples/ Ab -n 1000 Time taken for tests: 4.226077 seconds Mod_jk-1.26 JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties JkMount /servlets-examples/* ajp13 Time taken for tests: 2.824061 seconds A lot, lot faster. What is more interesting is when you increase the number of loops forom 1000 to 10000 Ab -n 10000 Time taken for tests: 239.614549 seconds Complete requests: 10000 Failed requests: 7011 Using mod_jk: Ab -n 10000 Time taken for tests: 21.811363 seconds Complete requests: 10000 Failed requests: 0 So, mod_proxy is a lot slower and doesn't handle load. (Perhaps increasing http listeners on TC would help). MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
