Filip Hanik wrote: > > >I suppose in this case the load balancer would run HOOK_MIDDLE, and > >sticky would run HOOK_LAST. > > cool, and then have the server just try them in that order? > ie, if the sticky server went down, it just takes the next > one from the list (and that list should be ordered well since > it comes from the LB algorithm) > > correct assumption? >
Think that it should return 'Server Busy' in case the sticky is not available, cause you may be in the middle of transaction while the other server might have no clue about that. MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
