> -----Original Message----- > From: Remy Maucherat > > > - it should be simpler than JK 1 or 2
That's the general idea > - it should have a name which doesn't confuse folks :) APR_JAVA as static core lib + mod_javalink? For example I wish to make a WIN2003 http.sys kernel module. > - No JNI in this module IMO: I think it would be better to > have another separate module dedicated to JNI (and trying to > use, for example, the in memory protocol handler or similar > techniques) if there's interest, rather than add complexity > to this module, which has very different needs As said in the initial post. The JNI has to be a separate project, as well as any other 'bizarre' communication rather then TCP/IP MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
