Fixing bug 13040 requires an additional patch that uses equals() for the whole algorithm. Hence the complications. This is what I was discussing above.
The matching rule can't be fully implemented AFAIK. I think the current algorithm is a nice compromise.
Please give examples where you think it's not good enough (and is worthwhile to support), but you will likely end up breaking other stuff.
Rémy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
