Bill Barker wrote:
"Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message

Yeah, well, I suppose that now that I'm an all-great-and-powerful PMC
member, I could RM a JK release.  However, I'd like to get out a TC 3.3.2
before that (so, if anyone else wants to RM JK in the meantime, you've got
my +1 :).  Also, if Larry wants to jump in to RM 3.3.2, I'll step aside,
since he has done such a great job on all of the other 3.3 releases.

The rules for 3.3 releases are still old-school.  I'll try to get a
[PROPOSAL] together by the end of the week.  If that's not rejected, then we
go to a [VOTE] (which will give me time to clarify if I count PMC members or
committers as binding votes).  In the unlikely event that we get enough
people to care about 3.3 enough to vote (seeing the trouble that Remy has
getting people to vote :), then there will be a 3.3.2 release.

As cool as it would  be to have a 3.3.3 release, I'd probably consider the
3.3.2 release to be an EOL release for the 3.x line.  Security releases
would still be provided, but not much more.

+1 :)


Rémy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to