I think Guenter is asking that we change mod_jk2 do be .so. Right now we build a .dll (at least if we build from the project files) but it would be easy to change this to .so and I'd be happy to do it.
Mike Anderson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/3/2004 9:57:00 AM >>> G�nter Knauf a �crit : > Hi, > >>Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as >>release manager if nobody else want to take the job before >>Friday. > > great, thanks! > > >>Comments welcome > > two things I would like to discuss: > 1) I would like to see all binaries packed to tar.gz or zip; Well it could be done easily, if nobody object, I'll choose .gz for Unixes and .zip for Windows. this is definitely better in two ways: the original file timestamp keeps intact, and if the download is broken normally the archiver reports that. > Oh, I've just checked, and this is only true for win32 and netware with mod_jk, with > mod_jk2 win32 has zip... > please Mike, can you put up zip files instead of renamed NLMs - also with future > mod_jk releases? > > 2) ask for a reason why the file extension was not changed to .so on Win32 when > Apache 1.3.15 moved to this...? Do you want it to revert to .dll ? On my Windows box the Apache 2.0.47 came with module named .so and not .dll. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
