nope that is it. The method I added, and would still like to get buy in, is to add backgroundProcess() as a method to the manager interface. That way, any manager can take advantage of the background thread from the context calling that method. If we don't want to change the interface, we can either add in reflection which I'm not a big fan of since I think managers should know what is going on, or skip the backgroundProcess for custom managers, I'll just implement a thread in the cluster instead.
what do you think? Filip -----Original Message----- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:32 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session StandardManager.java Filip Hanik wrote: > I'll roll back, fix my editor, I just noticed that Cool. Did you do anything more other than adding the new method ? Anyway, roll back the changes as a whole, so that diffs work. I think cosmetic changes to the source code should be separate commits. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
