+1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk. You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-)
MT. > -----Original Message----- > From: Henri Gomez > > Hi to all, > > Now that jk seems stabilized a bit, should we focalize on jk2 ? > > For instance I added some features to jk (ping/pong) which > should be ported to jk2. > > Also I wonder if APR is mandatory for jk2. > > I'd like to use APR as a facade to all Operating System calls. > > The goal is to hide all the complexity of Windows, iSeries, > differents Unix implementations behind APR which is now > stable and well diffused. > > As such it will be +1 to make APR mandatory and start > modifying jk2, to > make it use only APR call. > > But I'd like to have your opinion first. > > > PS: For those of you who was here 2 or 3 years ago, the requirement > of APR for mod_webapp got my total -1 at this time since it > wasn't really available, but today that's completly different. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
