DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17351>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17351 include directive bug with "dangling else" [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-25 18:37 ------- I don't follow your assessment. Carriage returns do not terminate Java statements, so either a syntax error should be generated, or the statement should work the same as if it were pasted directly in the text. I have never seen any documentation that says "<%@ include ... %> statements must be complete statements. If that is true, it should be clearly documented. I see no reason that "<%@ include ... %> statements should not simply flow text into the host document, but if there are such restrictions, they should be clearly specified. I would like to keep this issue open to get more clarification on the limitations of the "<%@ include ... %> statements. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
