Bill Barker wrote: > Well, (without checking), I believe that this one started last Friday and > Jakarta Votes last one-week. Unless you propose an additional Vote (which > will last one more week :), to replace this one, my count (of binding > votes) > is: 3 +1, 2 +0, 2 -0, 1 -1. I've also counted 3 non-binding +1s. > > The active committers have mostly all voted: Craig is semi-off tomcat > (but does great work on tomcat-user :), Amy has always only ever voted on > the projects she cares about, Kinman & Jan have been blown off by the rest > of us for months, so what do they care? > > AFAIK, the vote is wrapped up.
I think waiting until Friday is not too much ( one week voting period is reasonable ). And since this vote didn't have too much prior discussion and clarifications - a new vote may also be a good idea, clarifying the various aspects. I'm willing to change my vote to +1 if the proposal is changed to "minimal tomcat distribution" ( i.e. don't explicitely exclude JSP ). That may mean only jasper-runtime.jar, or not even that ( if placing it in WEB-INF still works ). Changing the name to "minimal" also keeps the door open to have only JMX+classloader+ant+download scripts, and have catalina.jar ( i.e. JSR154 ) downloaded. Or some other servlet implementation can be selected - so running the 4.1 .jar will be possible for a while, and updates to the servlet impl. will be consistent with updates to all other components IMO a lot has been discussed, we have more options and informations - so a new vote may be the best idea and may yield real consensus. I think we are all very close in position and we all agree on "minimal". I disagree on binding "minimal" to JSR154 ( in both directions - it is perfectly reasonable to add jasper-runtime or to remove the servlet container ). To increase the chance of a new vote with more consensus - I'm changing my vote to -1 on "minimal JSR-154-only". Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
