on 2002/12/10 1:00 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All I'm seeing is that I shouldn't pay attention to your posts (I should
> have learnt that a while ago, I guess) ;-) Is that good enough for you ?
As Pier says:
What-EVER!
> Sorry, no. You should try to give users as few choices as possible, if
> you're targetting your software at a broad audience (looking at the
> download stats, Tomcat has that kind of audience). You never read Joel
> on software, I suppose ...
> On the other side of the scale, advanced users who know what they want
> should be able to tweak the software to the death (that's my opinion;
> Joel doesn't concieve software for advanced users, appatrently). Tomcat
> allows that. However, the golden rule is that normal people shouldn't
> have to care (of course, it's far from perfect, and Tomcat is still way
> to hard to use for the average Joe, but that's another story, and I
> believe we're working on it).
You admit Tomcat is to hard to use. The reason it is to hard to use is
because it is bundled with a whole bunch of crap no one needs. I want to get
rid of the crap and just let people download something simple.
-jon
--
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
http://studioz.tv/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
