on 2002/12/9 12:33 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I speak for myself. I like and use jasper - and I think the tomcat > official releases should include both tomcat and jasper. All of the official releases or some of them? > If Sun or anyone else wants to release a JSR154-only product - they > can do it and we should make it easy to do so. > I don't think we should do it ( as tomcat community ). Why? So far, you haven't even given a real reason. > I heard the argument about "user choice" and "freedom to experiment" on > avalon ( to justify "everyone releasing his own container" ). I think > their current attempt to have a single product is a move in the right > direction. You are so funny! How quickly you seem to change your mind. Go back and re-read every single posting about Tomcat 3 vs. Tomcat 4 and read everything that I wrote to you especially closely. What you do not seem to understand is that I'm not asking for different container implementations (which was the problem with T3/T4 and Avalon). I'm simply asking for a distribution of the SAME container but with different dependencies. What I'm proposing would be like the Avalon community settling on a specific container implementation and then trying to decide if they were going to distribute a mail server component and a http component as default with it. > Is Apache http having n different releases with all the possible > combinations of modules ( to give users choice ) ? They include all the > modules in the httpd repository ( some disabled by default ). They don't distribute PHP. So, why should we distribute JSP? -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
