Pier Fumagalli wrote: > "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>We did, and apparently, there are 3 people disagreeing with the new >>proposal (one of whom because he just doesn't care, to quote his own words). > > > I don't care about a mediocre servlet engine aimed to "small-to-medium scale > websites that don't get 8 million hits per day" (quoting Craig) or a servlet > engine withstanding "nigthly tests involving 10 millions calls to > HelloWorldExample servlets" (quoting Henri)... > > Nope... Given that what pays my rent is something "different" now, for sure > I don't care about those two scenarios :) > > If Tomcat 5.0 follows the trend established by its predecessors, Jserv 1.0, > Jserv 2.0 (based on Catalina), Tomcat 4.0 and Tomcat 4.1, it'll be > installable one click, it will work straight out of the box on any > whatsoever OS on this planet (even on your toaster if it has a JVM), it will > support PERL modules, and it will fall over when you shove in it more than 5 > requests at the same time (but of course it will have the best admin console > available on the planet, using JMX, EJB and JTA, just because configurations > need to be transactional)... > > Bah... If you guys stop being ridiculous and come up with a proposal that is > something more than a couple of buzzwords, I'll shut up... (Hint Hint) :)
We won't. There are almost no features addition in the proposal, and everything is made to improve reliability and performance. I am started to get bored by this Pier. If you are so smart, help us. If you don't want to help us (apparently you're not even willing to review our code), then I think we should just ignore your rants. Please, Pier, I'm begging you, go use Resin :-D (I think this is the last answer I'll make to your emails until they get less FUD, and more substance) Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
