GOMEZ Henri wrote:

>>>If JkLogLevel <= REQUEST ?
>>>
>>Please, no more levels... Debug, info, error, etc is enough - 
>>request is 
>>not a level but a channel/log/whatever.
>>
> 
>>What next, add a 'headers' level to display the headers ? Is 
>>headers<request ? 
>>
> 
> Good idea the dump of header, I'll often have to track problems
> with them, seriously
> 
> 
>>Add a worker.ajp13.logRequest property if you want, and use INFO level.
>>
> 
> You're right it's better :
> 
> worker.ajp13.logRequest={The Proposed JkRequestLogFormat}
> 
> ie
> 
> worker.ajp13.logRequest="%b %w"
> 
> 


The new JkRequestLogFormat scopes at the Apache VirtualHost,
so you can specifiy different request logging formats for
different virtual hosts.  The above wouldn't allow that.


>>>Why not use instead JkLogLevel INFO + REQUEST to explicitly 
>>>explain we want request logged
>>>
>>Let's keep log level and option to the standard levels. 
>>
>>I'm -1 on messing with the levels, almost everyone agrees on the 
>>4-5 levels ( see log4j, commons-loging, etc ) and separate 'channels'
>>for logging different kinds of information.
>>
> 
> Ok, let drop this.
> 



I'm ok with dropping "request" from the JkLogLevel, though I wish
someone had said something when I first proposed this. :-)


The existance of a JkRequestLogFormat config for a VH could be
enough to trigger on logging of request data for a VH.


> 
>>>>Here is an example:
>>>>
>>>>JkMount /*/servlet/ ajp13
>>>>
>>>Great
>>>
>>Not very great, the mapper is already very messy - and this 
>>shortcut will 
>>be hard to support in future, we have enough troubles with the 
>>standard 
>>mappoings. 
>>
>>If you really need it, I'm ok if you check it in so you solve your 
>>problem, but I would leave it undocumented ( or documented as 
>>an experimental 
>>feature that might/will go away in future )
>>
>>A better solution ( IMHO ) would be for AutoAlias to automatically add 
>>a mapping for servlets and jsps, and maybe read a 
>>ctx_root/WEB-INF/jkmap.properties with additional mappings for the 
>>context. 
>>
> 
> You're speaking of jk 2.0 when Glenn works on jk 1.2.
> Let say that these features (JkMount/JkAlias) will be present in jk 1.2 only 
> and will be replaced in jk 2.0
> 



Right, the subject line states mod_jk 1.2.


Glenn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen             [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder    |
MOREnet System Programming               |  * if iz ina coment.      |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */                       |
----------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to