>I take a look at code but miss the org.javagroups stuffs,
>which cover effective replication.
>
>- Where could I find it ?

You can start with my doc, there are two references to JavaGroups in there
http://www.filip.net/tomcat/tomcat-javagroups.html
http://www.javagroups.com/

>- Does it use multicast or others broadcast techniques ?
Virtual Synchrony and Probabilistic broadcasting on top of IP Multicasting.
see the docs

Filip

~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.filip.net

>-----Original Message-----
>From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:06 PM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: RE: In memory session replication, reminder
>
>


>
>
>
>-
>Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
>EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED]        (. .)
>PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
>PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:57 PM
>>To: Tomcat Developers List
>>Subject: RE: In memory session replication, reminder
>>
>>
>>>> go. The better option would be to find a maintainer, obviously ;-)
>>
>>I would have no problem maintaining the code :)
>>
>>>Move it out of the core, it adds complexity.
>>>Leave/add any hooks you need,
>>
>>The current implementation is 4 core classes, it could be 3 if
>>we made the
>>GenericPrincipal serializable.
>>IMHO, the core is already in an outside module. The JavaGroups
>>system is the
>>core of the clustering and that is completely outside Tomcat itself.
>>
>>So we are talking about a core implementation of 3 classes, it
>>is not more
>>complex than that, and these classes you can extend to any
>>degree you want,
>>ie, you could write a file persistence manager on top of the current
>>implementation without any problems.
>>
>>Have a look at the code and see the simplicity of it. Session
>>replication is
>>not the complexity, it is the group communication that is, and
>>that is why
>>the current org.apache.catalina.cluster currently has way to
>>many classes in
>>the core.
>>
>>Filip
>>
>>~
>>Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
>>~
>>Filip Hanik
>>Software Architect
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>www.filip.net
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:07 PM
>>>To: Tomcat Developers List
>>>Subject: Re: In memory session replication, reminder
>>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll try to look at it this time.
>>>>
>>>> IMO, the Cluster feature in Catalina either needs a maintainer
>>>or needs to
>>>> go. The better option would be to find a maintainer, obviously ;-)
>>>
>>>IMHO the better option will be: both :-)
>>>
>>>Move it out of the core, it adds complexity. Leave/add any hooks you
>>>need, but keep the bulk of the code/interfaces out, in a separate
>>>module.
>>>
>>>I would even sugest j-t-c, since it's likely to need some of the
>>>things there ( unix sockets, shmem, etc ).
>>>
>>>Costin
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>><mailto:tomcat-dev->[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>For additional
>>>commands, e-mail:
>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For
>>additional commands, e-mail:
>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to