I take a look at code but miss the org.javagroups stuffs, which cover effective replication.
- Where could I find it ? - Does it use multicast or others broadcast techniques ? - Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-----Original Message----- >From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:57 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: In memory session replication, reminder > > >>> go. The better option would be to find a maintainer, obviously ;-) > >I would have no problem maintaining the code :) > >>Move it out of the core, it adds complexity. >>Leave/add any hooks you need, > >The current implementation is 4 core classes, it could be 3 if >we made the >GenericPrincipal serializable. >IMHO, the core is already in an outside module. The JavaGroups >system is the >core of the clustering and that is completely outside Tomcat itself. > >So we are talking about a core implementation of 3 classes, it >is not more >complex than that, and these classes you can extend to any >degree you want, >ie, you could write a file persistence manager on top of the current >implementation without any problems. > >Have a look at the code and see the simplicity of it. Session >replication is >not the complexity, it is the group communication that is, and >that is why >the current org.apache.catalina.cluster currently has way to >many classes in >the core. > >Filip > >~ >Namaste - I bow to the divine in you >~ >Filip Hanik >Software Architect >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >www.filip.net > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:07 PM >>To: Tomcat Developers List >>Subject: Re: In memory session replication, reminder >> >> >>On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: >> >>> I'll try to look at it this time. >>> >>> IMO, the Cluster feature in Catalina either needs a maintainer >>or needs to >>> go. The better option would be to find a maintainer, obviously ;-) >> >>IMHO the better option will be: both :-) >> >>Move it out of the core, it adds complexity. Leave/add any hooks you >>need, but keep the bulk of the code/interfaces out, in a separate >>module. >> >>I would even sugest j-t-c, since it's likely to need some of the >>things there ( unix sockets, shmem, etc ). >> >>Costin >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:tomcat-dev->[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional >>commands, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For >additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
