on 9/10/01 1:44 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'll read that as:
> "There shouldn't be any confirmed bugs above at major or higher severity
> open in the bug database". Otherwise, I disagree with your statement.
> We can still release if there are some, but that will need a vote on each
> particular issue.

Life Cycle Of A Bug
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/bug_status.html>

All bugs should be marked as VERIFIED before a release.

Note: In OSS projects, I'm ok with QA being the developer who RESOLVED the
bug, but of course the submitter (or someone else) being the QA is the
preference.

> Also, all bugs seem to start in the "NEW" state, although I think they
> should start as unconfirmed.

I agree.

-jon

Reply via email to