> on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
>
> I'm also worried about regression testing.
>
> >, whereas
> > there are 26 on Tomcat 4.0 currently open, and you didn't vote -1 on
4.0's
> > release plan... I'm not trying to "help out" anyone, neither trying to
say
> > that 4.0 should be given a -1, but I'm just trying to say that being
fair,
> > you can't veto their release given the reasons you listed above...
>
> I haven't voted for 4.0's release plan yet.
>
> However, given what you just said, -1 on that as well.
>
> > As I said, despite our disagreements and this whole "war" between 3.3
and
> > 4.0, I want to see a production quality R.I. for Servlet 2.2 and JSP
1.1,
> > and even if technically me and the 3.3 team are not "on the same line of
> > thoughts", I believe that if they proposed a release plan to get out
final
> > they know what they're doing...
>
> If there are bugs in the till, they should get resolved first.
I'll read that as:
"There shouldn't be any confirmed bugs above at major or higher severity
open in the bug database". Otherwise, I disagree with your statement.
We can still release if there are some, but that will need a vote on each
particular issue.
Also, all bugs seem to start in the "NEW" state, although I think they
should start as unconfirmed.
Remy
