on 4/10/01 1:59 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this possible for Tomcat too? Pros and cons? > > Thanks and have fun, > Paulo Gaspar Of course it is. Proxy HTTP is probably not as efficient as a lightweight protocol (ie: AJP), especially if the two systems are running on the same box (ie: local sockets). It also doesn't solve the configuration issues. All you are doing in this case is putting another layer in front of the Tomcat HTTPd. I don't see a reason to do that when the Tomcat HTTPd works just fine. All you are gaining is the Apache module features (like mod_rewrite). -jon
- Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project. Greg Wilkins
- Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty proj... cmanolache
- Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty ... Jon Stevens
- Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Je... cmanolache
- Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required fo... Jon Stevens
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer... Greg Wilkins
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP mainta... Mel Martinez
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP ma... Craig R. McClanahan
- Use of Apache proxy module to co... Paulo Gaspar
- RE: Use of Apache proxy modu... Jon Stevens
- RE: Use of Apache proxy ... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper J... Mel Martinez
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP ma... cmanolache
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper J... Mel Martinez
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP mainta... cmanolache
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP ma... Greg Wilkins
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper J... cmanolache
- RE: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty proj... Larry Isaacs