On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Mel Martinez wrote: > Greg, > > I am writing the jasper34 refactoring proposal. I am > late on getting it checked in because I have been > distracted by other issues (job hunting, for one). I > am nearly ready to submit it though. It is currently > in the form of a UML class model generated with > Together. I will submit it in html form inside the > tomcat 3.3 proposals directory for review. > Mel, could you bring me up to date on a couple of issues regarding this proposed proposal :-)? * Are you planning on supporting the new JSP 1.2 features? If not, this isn't going to be of much use for Tomcat 4.0. * Are you planning on maintaining compatibility with JDK 1.1? I don't personally like the idea of Tomcat 4.0's JSP environment being constrained by this -- either in the internal code of Jasper itself, or in the generated code for the servlet associated with each page. Craig
- Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project. Greg Wilkins
- Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty proj... cmanolache
- Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty ... Jon Stevens
- Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Je... cmanolache
- Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required fo... Jon Stevens
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer... Greg Wilkins
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP mainta... Mel Martinez
- Use of Apache proxy module to connect... Craig R. McClanahan
- Use of Apache proxy module to co... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Use of Apache proxy modu... Jon Stevens
- RE: Use of Apache proxy ... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper J... Mel Martinez
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP ma... cmanolache
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper J... Mel Martinez
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP mainta... cmanolache
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP ma... Greg Wilkins
- Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper J... cmanolache
- RE: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty proj... Larry Isaacs