On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > Yes sure. I think the best would be not to unpack the WARs (it's a lot
> > cleaner).
>
> +1, as long as we can keep performance reasonable.
Well, memory's cheap. You can always just read the whole WAR in.
Then you'll get great performance. :)
As a middle ground, it probably wouldn't be too horrible to
implement a ClassLoader that cached frequently-accessed resources from
the WAR.
Aaron
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Tomcat 4 unpacking of WAR files behavior Glenn Nielsen
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking of WAR files behavior Remy Maucherat
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking of WAR files behavior Glenn Nielsen
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking of WAR files behav... Remy Maucherat
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking of WAR files b... Glenn Nielsen
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking of WAR fi... Remy Maucherat
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking of WA... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking o... Aaron Mulder
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking o... Remy Maucherat
- [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 unpa... Glenn Nielsen
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 ... Remy Maucherat
- RE: Tomcat 4 unpacking of WAR files behavior Mike Braden
- Re: Tomcat 4 unpacking of WAR files behavior Remy Maucherat
