on 1/15/01 9:03 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reasons why there are advantages for (at least) the next year or so
> on having both 3.3 and 4.x were already stated so often today...
3.3 will get released. That isn't the question.
> ...and also how 3.3 commiters are scratching an itch and will not focus
> on 4.x while the itch is there...
Not true at all. Costin has said that he will not work on 4.x. Again, my
point being that perhaps it would be smarter to encourage people to work on
improving 4.x more quickly instead of having this fork of developer
resources working on 3.x.
If Costin and everyone else had put all of their energy on working on 4.x in
the first place, we wouldn't be in the same situation we are in today and
people would have been more willing to migrate from 3.0/3.1 to 4.x because
the improvement would have been more clear. Instead, now we are stuck in the
position of having to give people 3.2 and potentially 3.3 because people
have invested a lot into building on top of it. Where does it stop?
> And this Sun fixation? Craig doesn't seem to have a problem with Sun,
> does he?
I don't know.
-jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
