on 1/15/01 8:10 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you argue about how Valve's single chain of command ( where
> authentication, generation, etc are done in a single invoke() ) can be
> better than what all other server are doing ( and Apache 2.0 moves to a
> different level with the flexible HOOK mechanism ?
>
> Can you argue about the design of Catalina - and point to the point where
> we discussed _any_ of the requirements and design choices ?
>
> Can you argue about the ammount of public discussion during the 4.0 ?
>
> Or about the number of interfaces needed to do anything ?
>
> ( or has been any of this discussed and decided ? )
>
> Which is the FUD ?
Maybe instead of focusing all your effort on a code base that we agreed on
was not the future of Tomcat, you could have instead been suggesting /
implementing changes and improvements to Tomcat 4.0 to fix the issues that
you saw.
Craig is going down a development path. If you didn't like it, you should
have spoken up. Did you? No, instead you choose to go an entirely different
path and now you are being called on it (much to your annoyance).
Your comments above again restate the need to fork Tomcat 3.x out of Jakarta
in order to allow the developers to focus on creating the best *single*
container out there instead of being constantly belittled by your comments
about how our future product has faults and having you fix those things in
the older version instead of the version that everyone agreed upon as being
the future.
Does that make any sort of sense to you?
-jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
