on 1/15/01 5:41 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those are the "Jon's rules" I was talking about before.
>
> Paulo
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 02:30
>>
>
>> My mistake - it is of course a "project decision", the question should
>> have been - does it looks like the "decision" Jon is invoking to justify
>> stopping 3.3 ? Does it look like what Jon is claiming that I'm alone and
>> all other developers have decided for 4.0 ?
>>
>> Costin
How is that "Jon's rules"?
I haven't made an decision for the project one way or another (in fact, if
anything I gave a +1 for everything which I had previously -1'd...see my
"Fuck It" email that I previously posted) and as far as "my claims", that is
based on the votes that have already clearly passed.
Let me refer you (yet again) to this url for the reference:
<http://w6.metronet.com/~wjm/tomcat/2000/Aug/index.html#00195>
So, I'm still confused, how do you translate that into "Jon's rules"????
It is so funny, we keep going back and forth over stuff that is clearly
Costin's FUD. He is attacking me directly with FUD and you are believing it.
I don't get it. Wake up dude. Look at the facts, not Costin's FUD.
-jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
