What happens if a 3.3 proposal gets a -1?
>From the whole content of your posting I understand that the 3.3
existence is legal.
What happens if it is proposed again and gets -1.
What is the difference from voting to stop it?
(What am I understanding wrong?)
Have fun,
Paulo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hans
> Bergsten
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 01:53
>
> The way I feel right now is that the best way to answer this question
> is by a vote on this list, where all +1 votes for TC 3.3 also means a
> commitment to help fix bugs in TC 3.3. That's pretty much how we got
> from TC 3.1 to TC 3.2. Sam announced his intention to step up as the
> release manager for TC 3.2 and and start cutting milestone releases
> in a mail titled "Towards a 3.2 release" (14 June, 2000). For various
> reasons the release dragged on for a very long time, and eventually
> Craig took on the role as release manager and started to cut betas.
> November 27, 2000, Craig asked for a vote on the release of 3.2 and
> a plan for continued support of the 3.2.x branch. This vote got the
> required +1 and no -1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
