> > fact, in that same thread, there seemed to be support for ongoing > > enhancements on the 3.x code line, even to the point of supporting the > > latest specs: > > http://w6.metronet.com/~wjm/tomcat/2000/Aug/msg00486.html > > Correct. However, that was never proposed or agreed upon. Of course, what you don't like is either "not proposed or agreed" or "not justified " ( the -1 votes against you ) or "not agreed by the PMC". And what you want is "what the community want". -- Costin P.S. - ops, it seems you got me again - into answering. Sorry. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- TC 4 / mod_jk Dan Milstein
- Re: TC 4 / mod_jk Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Larry Isaacs
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Paulo Gaspar
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Rob S.
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Sam Ruby
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Scott Sanders
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Michael . Smith
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Jon Stevens
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info cmanolache
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Jon Stevens
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda /... Jon Stevens
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda /... Remy Maucherat
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Jon Stevens
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Jon Stevens
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Paulo Gaspar