> I for one did not see continuing this discussion on tomcat dev as being > productive. It has continued on the PMC mailing list. ... > The role of the PMC in such decisions will be a topic of discussion. In > fact, that is precisely the discussion that has continued in the PMC > mailing list. Of course, it would be nice to make the list archive available - since the PMC is "deciding the future of tomcat" I guess commiters should at least be able to read the debate. ( and have an example of "productive" debate - which is probably easier when one side have the representation it has ). I'm sure anyone who will participate to the Bay Area meeting would like to have access to it. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Paulo Gaspar
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda /... Jon Stevens
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Jon Stevens
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Jon Stevens
- RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agen... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Sam Ruby
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info cmanolache
- Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Jon Stevens
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info GOMEZ Henri
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Peter Donald
- Re: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Craig R. McClanahan
- Web connectrors [was: RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Mee... Marc Saegesser
- TC 4 / mod_jk Dan Milstein
- Re: TC 4 / mod_jk Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Larry Isaacs
- RE: FW: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info Paulo Gaspar