James Duncan Davidson wrote:
>
> What I'm saying is that you can redist the jaxp.jar
> file containing the classes of the implementation.
> That's what we need to be doing in the Apache tree
> anyway since we don't have a source redistribution
> license.
IMHO, we should have a cleanroom re-implementation of this important API.
If the current codebase in Apache doesn't meet this criteria, this problem
should be addressed ASAP.
For the life of me, I can see no reason why the JAXP JSR community wishes
to remain a PITA in this matter. It should follow the lead of the servlet
JSR. What's particularly puzzling about this to me is that the enlightened
individual that took that JSR fully open source leads the JAXP JSR...
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
