on 12/18/2000 10:01 AM, "Greg Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a use of Tomcat 3.1 on several production machines, may I say "thanks" also > to > Costin and everyone else who supports 3.1 (and 3.1.1, 3.2, 3.2.1, etc.) We > are > in no position to jump to 4.0 just because its trendy and has more > "development > activity"... > > Thanks again, > -Greg Bailey I wish people would pay more attention to what the overall issues are instead of focusing on entirely the wrong things. That isn't what I was saying at all. The issue is the idea of a 3.3 and I'm not saying to "jump" to 4.0. Please look at all the information available to you about what is happening before commenting again. thanks, -jon
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Henri Gomez
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x cmanolache
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Aaron Mulder
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x kenneth topp
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Paul Frieden
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Greg Bailey
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- 3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_... Marc Saegesser
- [VOTE] Committer Status for ... Craig R. McClanahan
- Committers Pierre Delisle
- Re: Committers Remy Maucherat
- Re: [VOTE] Committer Status ... Hans Bergsten
- Re: [VOTE] Committer Status ... Jon Stevens