Tom Collins said: > On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 08:24 AM, Matthew Walker wrote: >> Not as far as I can tell. As I've said before, lanparty recieves mail >> from >> everywhere except arsenic just fine. The only time it doesn't work is >> when >> sending mail directly from arsenic to lanparty. (Though, if I >> hand-enter the >> message, it works...) > > My guess is that for some reason arsenic is deciding that the mail is > local and doesn't need to be delivered to lanparty. > > Unless you're seeing it get delivered with TLS and then immediately > returned.
Exactly. > > Can you post the full headers from one of the mis-behaving messages? Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 27981 invoked from network); 30 May 2003 15:26:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lanparty.mthmarketing.com) (216.190.203.151) by mail.kydance.net with SMTP; 30 May 2003 15:26:22 -0000 ^^^^^^ Forgeglobal.com returning it to Kydance.net re-addressed. Notice the 'delivered-to' header. Received: (qmail 15992 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2003 15:26:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO arsenic.mthmarketing.com) (216.190.203.134) by 0 with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 May 2003 15:26:21 -0000 ^^^^^^ Forgeglobal.com recieving it from Kydance.net Received: (qmail 27976 invoked by uid 81); 30 May 2003 15:26:21 -0000 Received: from 216.190.203.130 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mwalker%kydance.net) by squirrelmail.kydance.net with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2003 09:26:21 -0600 (MDT) ^^^^^^ SquirrelMail delivering it to Qmail. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 09:26:21 -0600 (MDT) Subject: RE: Testing From: "Matthew Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^^^^^ I know this isn't authoritative, but notice the correct forgeglobal.com address here. User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal