I'd say (2), we never want to automatically destroy buffers which the user has explicitly named, let them do that.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 06:34:58PM -0500, J Raynor wrote: > Your proposed implementation looks fine to me. I have a question about this: > > > - buffer-limit is only applied to !sticky buffers > > Which of these did you mean? > > 1. Buffer-limit limits the total number of buffers (the sum of sticky > and non-sticky), but only non-sticky buffers get aged away. > > 2. Buffer-limit only limits the number of non-sticky buffers. Users > can have unlimited sticky buffers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
