Hello Nicholas, I agree with you and will explain this to her. Also I find the reasoning of Tiago sound.
On Friday 15 of April 2011 23:44:30 Nicholas Marriott wrote: > Hi > > I don't know about this because an empty variable is not the same as > being unset and I think it is confusing to treat them the same. But > maybe I'm just being pedantic, I can't really think of a case where > having an empty LC_ALL or LC_CTYPE would be useful... > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:57:30PM +0200, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Friday 15 of April 2011 01:19:10 Tiago Resende wrote: > > > I also figured out why it wasn't working for me without -u. My LC_ALL, > > > instead of being unset, was set to an empty string. So, tmux was > > > assuming I was utf8-less instead of going on to check LC_CTYPE and > > > LANG. In conclusion, please disregard all I said above. > > > > it seems to me that the proposed patch would solve an empty (but not > > unset) LC_ALL in this bug report: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622772 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
