If we must say something, I think it should be more along the lines of this statement.
Ekr On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 5:32 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz= [email protected]> wrote: > > > - I agree with this. It makes sense to respond, in simple technical > terms. Not with judgement, not with assumption of ill intent by any > parties. Just plain technical advice. > > > Totally agree! > > It can be as simple as > The TLS working group feels that QKD is still too premature to be a secure > solution to any problem. We note that other organizations also feel this > way [refs to UKNCSC, NSA if needed]. We are unlikely to do any work in this > area now. We suggest that you look at the QCRG, in our related organization > the IRTF, which has active QKD discussions. > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
