Hi Stephen,

I agree with your message and would hope to see it addressed directly and fully 
by the TLS WG without any undue singular focus on specific details.

Nadim Kobeissi
Symbolic Software • https://symbolic.software

> On 22 Mar 2026, at 7:05 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
>> On 22/03/2026 17:49, Joseph Salowey wrote:
>> ML-KEM WGLC Update
>> We are working through issues brought up during the working group last
>> call. We believe addressing these issues is necessary to determine if we
>> have rough consensus to move forward. We expect the author to address the
>> following points:
>> * Key Reuse
>> * Text for preferring Hybrids
>> * Whether to include motivations (see Liaison Statement)
>> We expect resolving these issues will take a few weeks after which we will
>> run a targeted consensus call to see if text changes are acceptable to the
>> working group.
> 
> The above seems to me unclear and hard to understand.
> 
> Are you saying that the 2nd WGLC failed due to a lack of rough
> consensus? (Or not?)
> 
> Either way, I don't know what you mean by a "targeted consensus
> call" - if the 2nd WGLC failed, then surely another WGLC will be
> needed or the draft is just stalled. If the 2nd WGLC succeeded,
> then (that'd be a surprise and) I don't get why some other consensus
> call would be needed, nor for what.
> 
> So I'm confused, sorry.
> 
> I do get that sometimes the result of a WGLC is "go ahead after
> fixing these nits" but I don't see how that applies in a situation
> with the fairly fundamental controversies we've seen related to
> this draft.
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> 
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sean and Joe
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> <OpenPGP_signature.asc>

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to