2026-03-22 22:23 GMT+01:00 Muhammad Usama Sardar <[email protected]>: > Hi Joe and Sean, > > I have the same concern as Stephen. Please precisely specify the binary > outcome of the WGLC. > > Moreover, please add the following to the list: > > • Bring an attestation of ML-KEM from Crypto Review Panel [0] of CFRG
I’m sorry, what is a Crypto Review Panel “attestation,” what is it expected to bring over the multi-year, international NIST competition, and why would an IRTF opinion be blocking for an IETF document? > • Improve the security considerations to thoroughly and precisely discuss > threat model, all the risks and concerns, such as [1] > • Recommend hybrids first (draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update): apples and > oranges should not be put in the same category > On your third bullet, I believe the question should not be *whether* to > include motivation or not; it should be *how* to improve the motivation. IEEE > 802.11 liaison statement should be cited here, whenever it becomes available. > I don't see it yet on Liaison Statements page. What if some other SDO sends a > LS not to publish it? Which one do we prefer? > > Sincerely, > > -Usama > > [0] https://wiki.ietf.org/group/cfrg/CryptoPanel > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/jlsYHENwqMv-4XPRvunqKsAL36k/ > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > *Attachments:* > • smime.p7s
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
