On 02.03.26 09:20, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 08:55:45AM +0100, Muhammad Usama Sardar wrote:On 02.03.26 02:23, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:19: ๐ฎ โ NTT^{-1}(NTT(๐) โ ๐ฒ) + ๐_๐I believe that should be transpose of A and not NTT(A). Please correct me if I am misunderstanding something. Your email is actually a perfect example of where FATT analysis could help.No, it is rather an example of the limitations of simple UTF-8 text, in which the transpose superscript was too difficult to write. This has nothing to do with FATT.
I was referring to "your email" i.e., the reuse matter in general and not this specific transpose matter in my email. You are surely entitled to your opinion andย I surely don't need to convince everyone in the world that FATT could have helped.
-Usama
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
