Hi Rich,
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:42:57PM +0100, Thomas Fossati wrote:
I am concerned about the new registry table being different from the
majority of TLS registrations. Why is that?
You mean why we are using "DTLS-only" rather than "DTLS-OK"?
Or the fact that we don't have a "Comments/Notes" column?
If the former, it makes sense to invert the logic because RRC is
primarily a DTLS mechanism, therefore it'd always score true using
"DTLS-OK" semantic.
If the latter, we have an open PR to align with rfc8447bis [1].
cheers, t
[1] https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/75
You are right, the new registry should be Expert Review.
I have added https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/78 to track this.
cheers, t
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
