Hi Rich, On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 01:22:27PM +0100, Salz, Rich wrote:
I have no problems with the RRC registration.
Cool, thanks.
I am concerned about the new registry table being different from the majority of TLS registrations. Why is that?
You mean why we are using "DTLS-only" rather than "DTLS-OK"? Or the fact that we don't have a "Comments/Notes" column? If the former, it makes sense to invert the logic because RRC is primarily a DTLS mechanism, therefore it'd always score true using "DTLS-OK" semantic. If the latter, we have an open PR to align with rfc8447bis [1]. cheers, t [1] https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/75 _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
