I don't support adoption. My opinions are that SLH-DSA seems like a pretty poor fit for TLS, and that PQ signatures don't have a strong motivation for deployment right now, and that the draft can achieve its goals outside the WG, and that I hope the WG still attempts to avoid unprincipled proliferation of cryptography options.
Cheers, Joe On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 14:30, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > We are continuing with our WG adoption calls for the following I-D: Use of > SLH-DSA in TLS 1.3 [1]; see [2] for more information about this tranche of > adoption calls. If you support adoption and are willing to review and > contribute text, please send a message to the list. If you do not support > adoption of this draft, please send a message to the list and indicate why. > This call will close at 2359 UTC on 30 May 2025. > > Reminder: This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the > mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS. > > Cheers, > Joe and Sean > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-reddy-tls-slhdsa/ > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KMOTm_lE5OIAKG8_chDlRKuav7c/ > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
