> It might be fine to adopt this only for publication as Experimental. There is actually another option for those that just want a stable reference. Quoting from draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis:
> D: Indicates that the item is discouraged. This marking could be > used to identify mechanisms that might result in problems if they > are used, such as a weak cryptographic algorithm or a mechanism > that might cause interoperability problems in deployment. When > marking a registry entry as “D”, either the References or the > Comments Column MUST include sufficient information to determine > why the marking has been applied. Implementers SHOULD consult the > linked references associated with the item to determine the > conditions under which it SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT be used. I believe this captures my main concerns quite well. In particular, I believe it conveys the point that absent very specific considerations (and I still have not heard of any I consider valid), deploying this is probably a bad idea. -- TBB
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
