DJB's numbered points are fair. There should be an answer for (1) (2) and (3) even if there isn't agreement.
thanks, Rob On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 3:18 PM D. J. Bernstein <d...@cr.yp.to> wrote: > Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL writes: > > “Consensus” is not about reaching no dissenters. > > Consensus doesn't require unanimity, but it does require fairly > considering and trying to resolve each objection---which is exactly what > the list records show didn't happen here. > > Also, _if_ resolution fails and an objection is overridden by general > agreement, the reasons for overriding it have to be documented. > > > It’s about the “prevailing” opinion of majority > > No, voting is _not_ how IETF is supposed to work. IETF doesn't even have > a membership mechanism, so if voting were allowed then there wouldn't > even be the most basic protection against votes being bought. > > ---D. J. Bernstein > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
