I oppose adoption. thanks, Rob
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:21 PM Flo D <Flo.D=40ncsc.gov...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I support adoption of this draft and am happy to review. > > Flo > > fl...@ncsc.gov.uk > UK National Cyber Security Centre > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> > Sent: 01 April 2025 13:58 > To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org> > Subject: [TLS] WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for > TLS 1.3 > > We are continuing with our pre-announced tranche of WG adoption calls; see > [0] for more information. This time we are issuing a WG adoption call for > the ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3 I-D [1]. If you support > adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, please send a > message to the list. If you do not support adoption of this draft, please > send a message to the list and indicate why. This call will close at 2359 > UTC on 15 April 2025. > > In response to other WG adoption calls, Dan Bernstein pointed out some > potential IPR (see [2]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in accordance > with BCP 79. Additional information is provided here; see [3]. > > BCP 79 makes this important point: > > (b) The IETF, following normal processes, can decide to use > technology for which IPR disclosures have been made if it decides > that such a use is warranted. > > WG members can take this information into account during this adoption > call to determine if we should adopt these drafts. > > Reminder: This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the > mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS. > > Cheers, > Joe and Sean > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
