I prefer 2.

On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 6:37 PM Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote:

> Currently RFC 8446 (and RFC8446bis) do not forbid the reuse of ephemeral
> keys.  This was the consensus of the working group during the development
> of TLS 1.3.  There has been more recent discussion on the list to forbid
> reuse for ML-KEM/hybrid key exchange.  There are several possible options
> here:
>
>
>    1.
>
>    Keep things as they are (ie. say nothing, as was done in previous TLS
>    versions, to forbid the reuse of ephemeral keys) - this is the default
>    action if there is no consensus
>    2.
>
>    Disallow reuse for specific ciphersuites.  It doesn’t appear that
>    there is any real difference in this matter between MLKEM/hybrids and ECDH
>    here except that there are many more ECDH implementations (some of which
>    may reuse a keyshare)
>    3.
>
>    Update 8446 to disallow reuse of ephemeral keyshares in general.  This
>    could be done by revising RFC 8446bis or with a separate document that
>    updates RFC 8446/bis
>
>
> We would like to know if there are folks who think the reuse of keyshares
> is important for HTTP or non-HTTP use cases.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Joe, Deirdre and Sean
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to