+1 From: Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> Date: Thursday, 5 December 2024 at 22:20 To: Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Cc: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org> Subject: [TLS] Re: draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement I hope so. Can we start an adoption call?
Russ On Dec 5, 2024, at 4:08 PM, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: How do we proceed with this draft? This draft is quite boring (which is good from a cryptographical perspective); it just says ‘take ML-KEM and insert it as a key agreement into TLS in the obvious way’. I understand that people want to discuss the hybrid KEM draft more (because there are more options there) – can we at least get the less controversial part done?
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
