> Which one? Yours or Panos et al? :) I don’t care – we just need something reasonable, and those both qualify…
From: Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 5:58 PM To: Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluh...@cisco.com>; Andrey Jivsov <cry...@brainhub.org>; TLS@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] Re: draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement As for it accidentally becoming “MTI”, well I’m pretty sure that won’t happen (barring Q-day happening and the current hybrid key exchanges no longer making sense). Since the draft has “N” for the recommended column, I’m also pretty sanguine about it. As for people implementing it instead of hybrid, well, the working group can help to prevent that by moving ahead with the hybrid draft (hint, hint). Which one? Yours or Panos et al? :)
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
