On 26.11.24 18:06, Watson Ladd wrote:

But it's starting from 0 years rather than 6 years, with no formal analysis vs many, with few to zero implementations vs considerable support.

I share this concern. Therefore, I do not support adoption. I think nobody would like to formally verify the updates to TLS 1.2 - at least not me - sorry!

Let's put all the good energies and great minds in making TLS 1.3 stronger.

Usama

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to