On 11/15/2024 4:28 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hiya,
On 16/11/2024 00:17, Joseph Salowey wrote:
This is the working group last call for SSLKEYLOGFILE Extension for
Encrypted Client Hello. Please review
draft-ietf-tls-ech-keylogfile-01 [1]
and reply to this thread indicating if you think it is ready for
publication or not. If you do not think it is ready please indicate
why.
This call will end on November 30, 2024.
As I said before, I don't think this document should be published.
(I was in the rough then so expect to be again.)
Ditto.
The proposed IANA registry for labels is wrong I think. Changes to
the TLS protocol to create new (or change existing) labels that
would be in this registry need IETF consensus and hence so should
changes to this registry. (Or at least a requirement that the
label maps directly to something with IETF consensus.)
Yes. The potential for abuse is quite large. I agree with Stephen that
it would be better if there was no such registry. And if such a registry
is somehow created, new entries should require IETF consensus.
I would hope this wouldn't be published before ECH. (Speaking of
which, can we move that along some?:-)
+1
-- Christian Huitema
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
