I also support WG adoption.

One suggestion in the Introduction:

"ML-DSA [FIPS204] is a post-quantum signature schemes standardised by NIST. It 
is a module-lattice based scheme." -> "ML-DSA is a module-lattice-based digital 
signature algorithm standardised by NIST in [FIPS204]."

And one suggestion in Section 3:

"Note that these are the pure versions and should not be confused with prehash 
variants such as HashML-DSA-44 also defined in [FIPS204]." -> "Note that these 
values represent ML-DSA and not HashML-DSA [FIPS204, Section 5.4]."

Those who read this later who have not been following mailing list discussions 
might not understand what is meant by "pure versions" since the word "pure" is 
not used in FIPS 204- so it is probably best to just call these ML-DSA and 
HashML-DSA. It may also be helpful to include a pointer to the specific section 
in FIPS 204 where HashML-DSA is defined.

Rebecca Guthrie
she/her
Center for Cybersecurity Standards (CCSS)
Cybersecurity Collaboration Center (CCC)
National Security Agency (NSA)

From: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 9:41 AM
To: Alicja Kario <hka...@redhat.com>; Bas Westerbaan 
<bas=40cloudflare....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: <tls@ietf.org> <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: [TLS] Re: ML-DSA in TLS

> Very happy to see it.
>
>I'm for workgroup adoption of it.

+1

From: Alicja Kario <hka...@redhat.com<mailto:hka...@redhat.com>>
Date: Friday, 15 November 2024 at 15:34
To: Bas Westerbaan 
<bas=40cloudflare....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:bas=40cloudflare....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Cc: <tls@ietf.org<mailto:tls@ietf.org>>
Subject: [TLS] Re: ML-DSA in TLS
Very happy to see it.

I'm for workgroup adoption of it.

On Friday, 15 November 2024 11:51:31 CET, Bas Westerbaan wrote:
> We have posted a -00.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa-00
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 7:29 PM Bas Westerbaan 
> <b...@cloudflare.com<mailto:b...@cloudflare.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Unless I overlooked something, we don't have a draft out to
> assign a SignatureAlgorithm to ML-DSA for use in TLS.
>
> It's two days past the I-D submission deadline, but I wanted to
> point you to a short draft we put together to fill this gap.
>
> https://bwesterb.github.io/tls-mldsa/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa.html
>
> So far, I see only one open question: whether to set a non-zero
> context string.
>
> Best,
>
>  Bas
>
>
>

--
Regards,
Alicja (nee Hubert) Kario
Principal Quality Engineer, RHEL Crypto team
Web: 
https://www.redhat.com/en/global/czech-republic?oh=www.cz.redhat.com<http://www.cz.redhat.com/>
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org<mailto:tls@ietf.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org<mailto:tls-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to