Reminder that this adoption call is still on going. spt
> On Nov 5, 2024, at 16:26, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > > >> On Nov 5, 2024, at 16:25, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >> >> REQUEST: Let’s not rehash all the context. It is provided for those who >> might not remember or those that were not around for the duration. >> >> CONTEXT: Way back in 2016 after the WG had embarked on developing TLS 1.3, >> Peter Gutmann suggested that another way to “fix” TLS was to specify a >> version of TLS that indicates a “known-good config drawn from the maybe 10 >> extension-RFCs”; see [0]. Peter submitted his “TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term >> Support”; see [1]. There was some list discussion; see [2]. Peter asked us >> about adopting the I-D; see [3]. He made changes based on that feedback; see >> [4]. At IETF 98, the WG discussed adopting this I-D and the sense of the >> room was to not adopt the I-D; see [5]. Progress on this document was paused >> while the WG worked on TLS 1.3. Once RFC 8447 was published, a code point >> was assigned for the “tls-lts” extensions; see [6] and [7]. Now that we are >> looking to publish Feature Freeze for TLS 1.2 [8][9] we want to make sure >> that the working group sentiment has not changed over time so we are running >> an adoption call for TLS-LTS. >> >> MESSAGE: This message is to judge consensus on whether there is support to >> adopt TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support; see [1]. If you support >> adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, please send a >> message to the list. If you do not support adoption of this draft, please >> send a message to the list and indicate why. This call will close on >> November X, 2024. > > Whoops November 26, 2024. > >> Thanks, >> spt >> >> [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Lr7VwcPCjzDJelUTRTIUJf_8-ww/ >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gutmann-tls-lts/ >> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/r4w75rooy-r8Ky-xXAUoslYTL_U/ >> [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6tBftKBmxYz_wUcq79_zH8yDTQk/ >> [4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aw9BOS4HJ9uum0snEZqSuKA4BYw/ >> [5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/materials/minutes-98-tls-00 >> [6] >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/bP84S3tHSG9gAmc45CLTjpiA0z8/ >> [7] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/xmhnVQTckDmUkoxhx4wx1bfpYXM/ >> Thanks to Peter because he helped us iron out the >> wrinkles in the tls-reg-review process. >> [8] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen/ >> [9] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/f62yvLL_4mDEsRzAY46L4QLjakU/ > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
