> On Nov 5, 2024, at 16:25, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > REQUEST: Let’s not rehash all the context. It is provided for those who > might not remember or those that were not around for the duration. > > CONTEXT: Way back in 2016 after the WG had embarked on developing TLS 1.3, > Peter Gutmann suggested that another way to “fix” TLS was to specify a > version of TLS that indicates a “known-good config drawn from the maybe 10 > extension-RFCs”; see [0]. Peter submitted his “TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term > Support”; see [1]. There was some list discussion; see [2]. Peter asked us > about adopting the I-D; see [3]. He made changes based on that feedback; see > [4]. At IETF 98, the WG discussed adopting this I-D and the sense of the room > was to not adopt the I-D; see [5]. Progress on this document was paused while > the WG worked on TLS 1.3. Once RFC 8447 was published, a code point was > assigned for the “tls-lts” extensions; see [6] and [7]. Now that we are > looking to publish Feature Freeze for TLS 1.2 [8][9] we want to make sure > that the working group sentiment has not changed over time so we are running > an adoption call for TLS-LTS. > > MESSAGE: This message is to judge consensus on whether there is support to > adopt TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support; see [1]. If you support adoption > and are willing to review and contribute text, please send a message to the > list. If you do not support adoption of this draft, please send a message to > the list and indicate why. This call will close on November X, 2024.
Whoops November 26, 2024. > Thanks, > spt > > [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Lr7VwcPCjzDJelUTRTIUJf_8-ww/ > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gutmann-tls-lts/ > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/r4w75rooy-r8Ky-xXAUoslYTL_U/ > [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6tBftKBmxYz_wUcq79_zH8yDTQk/ > [4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aw9BOS4HJ9uum0snEZqSuKA4BYw/ > [5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/materials/minutes-98-tls-00 > [6] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/bP84S3tHSG9gAmc45CLTjpiA0z8/ > [7] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/xmhnVQTckDmUkoxhx4wx1bfpYXM/ > Thanks to Peter because he helped us iron out the > wrinkles in the tls-reg-review process. > [8] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen/ > [9] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/f62yvLL_4mDEsRzAY46L4QLjakU/ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
